I’m not sure what APG does algorithmically that PTGUI cannot do, but when DxO develops panorama sewing capabilities, I would hope they can match the remarkable flexibility that APG offers. APG can often construct a composite, although post-processing is necessary to correct some overall distortions. Sometimes this is necessary, as when there is glare on the subject or when there is an obstacle in front of some part of the subject. PTGUI is very unhappy with this approach, apparently because it really expects to find a common camera position for all the images it sews together, and the perspective corrections confuse it greatly.Ī related issue, where APG is able to produce composite images and PTGUI is not, is when the individual photos are shot from different positions. When the overlap of images is poor, I can often construct a decent panorama by applying a perspective correction first and then sewing with APG. I presume that this minimal functionality would be easy for DxO to replicate. I’ve found that panoramas shot from a single vantage point with a handheld camera can be sewn together nicely with either Auto Pano Giga or PTGUI. Integration of panorama stitching into PhotoLab would make life a whole lot easier. My present workflow (shooting composite images of murals) is an awkward blend of software that involves GIMP, DxO ViewPoint, Kolor Auto Pano Giga, and DxO PhotoLab. I would also vote for adding panorama stitching to DxO PhotoLab. The files are saved to disk and a program is called with the files as a parameter. Maybe sending a number of files to a pano stitching program would be some solution. We update our decoding database following this evolution, but it takes some time, so there is a delay between the release of a camera and the update of a new version of Autopano that support this new encoding format.Īs you can see there’s a lot of arguments to have the pano stitching function not to be part of a raw converter. tiff 16 bits format, which is the equivalent of what Autopano does during the decoding. The solution for that is to decode this new RAW format in. This usually happens when a new camera model is released, containing a new coding of its RAW format and which is not included in Autopano. Therefore, it is possible that Autopano can’t decode some RAW files, simply because the database is not updated. However, the different RAW formats evolve over time, depending on brands and camera models. Prefer shooting in JPG or TIFF if you do not want to treat the RAW photos.Īutopano is able to decode the RAW format. It is best to treat your RAWs in dedicated software beforehand. Panoramas can also be saved in a wide variety of image formats, including JPEG, TIFF, and Photoshop’s PSD/PSB format NOTE: This version is for 64-bit Windows. Autopano is stitching software, not RAW decoding software, so Autopano will only decode the RAW files with the very default values, defeating the whole purpose of RAW shooting. ICE can also create a panorama from a panning video, including stop-motion action overlaid on the background. From the Gopro website Using Autopano Software - GoPro Support Hub I shoot RAW so I’ve some control on the de-mosaicing process and a good basis for the further editings.Īutopano had a very basic converter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |